Guide & tracker
Why do data centers use so much water?
Tracker data as of Nov 6, 2026 · national figures plus every published project figure
Short answer
Mostly to get rid of heat. Servers turn the electricity they use into heat, and most big data centers remove it by evaporating water in cooling towers, the most energy-efficient method at scale, which uses the water up[4][3]. U.S. data centers directly used about 17 billion gallons of water in 2023, up from 5.6 billion gallons in 2014, according to an estimate cited by the Congressional Research Service[1]; a Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory figure puts 2023 direct use at 66 billion liters[3]. Far more is used indirectly by the power plants that supply them: about 211 billion gallons in 2023[2]. A single site’s use varies with how big it is, how densely it packs computing and what kind of cooling it has[5].
Looking for the water behind a single ChatGPT or Gemini prompt? See How much water does AI use?.
- direct water use by U.S. data centers in 2023[1]
- 17B gal
- indirect water use through electricity generation, 2023[2]
- 211B gal
- share of the water drawn by evaporative cooling that is lost to evaporation[3]
- ~80%
Why do data centers use so much water?
Because the electricity a data center uses ends up as heat, and evaporating water is the most energy-efficient way to get rid of it. Servers and storage systems give off heat as a by-product of their work[6], and keeping them cool can take as much as 40% of a data center’s energy[7]. That is why most big modern facilities cool by evaporation, especially in hot climates, even though the method consumes water directly[4]. The Congressional Research Service puts the trade-off plainly: evaporation-based systems generally use less energy than air-cooled chillers and other waterless designs, which save the water but spend more power[8].
Evaporation is also why the water doesn’t come back. In a cooling tower, heat leaves the building as water vapor[9]. The Environmental Law Institute estimates that evaporative systems lose about 80% of the water they draw and discharge the other 20%[3]. The U.S. Geological Survey calls that consumptive use: water that is no longer available to the local supply, rather than water borrowed and returned[10].
Three things decide how much a particular site uses: its size, how densely it packs computing, and the kind of cooling it runs[5]. Density is rising fast. An industry executive quoted by IEEE Spectrum put the average rack at around 8 kilowatts, and AI racks at up to 100[11]. More power in the same room means more heat to remove, which is pushing AI campuses toward liquid cooling that works right at the chip[12].
The largest share of a data center’s water footprint isn’t on site at all. The power plants that make its electricity need water too[13]: about 211 billion gallons in 2023 by one federal estimate[2], roughly 12 times the 17 billion gallons data centers used directly that year[1].
Some operators are choosing the other side of the trade. Microsoft says its zero-water-for-cooling design will save more than 125 million liters of water per data center each year[14], at the cost of a higher PUE and what it calls a nominal increase in annual energy use[14]. The Environmental and Energy Study Institute sums up the choice: where water is scarce, liquid cooling of servers fits best; where the power grid is strained, evaporative towers make more sense because they need little electricity[2].
Do AI data centers use a lot of water?
They can, because AI packs far more heat into each rack: about 8 kilowatts for an average rack against up to 100 for AI, according to an industry executive quoted by IEEE Spectrum[11]. How much water a site uses depends on its size, its computing density and its cooling system[5], and the densest AI hardware is pushing cooling toward liquid systems that work right at the chip[12]. Many of those run as closed loops, which keep water circulating in a sealed system instead of evaporating it[8]; Meta says its closed-loop, direct-to-chip sites use no water in the cooling system during operation[15] (a company claim).
The electricity is the bigger water story. Generating the power U.S. data centers used in 2023 consumed roughly 211 billion gallons[2], about 12 times the 17 billion used on site[1], so an AI campus’s power draw matters as much as its cooling design. Company totals are rising: Google says its water consumption grew 34% from 2024 to 2025[16], and Microsoft’s roughly doubled between fiscal 2020 and 2025[17], both company-reported.
How much water does one data center use?
It varies enormously. Virginia's JLARC found most data centers use about as much water as an average large office building or less, though a few use substantially more and some use less than a typical household[5]. The amount depends on the facility's size, computing density and type of cooling[5]. At the high end, larger data centers can use up to 5 million gallons a day, according to reporting cited by the Environmental and Energy Study Institute[2].
Local examples show why it can matter. Google's facilities in The Dalles, Oregon, used 355.1 million gallons in 2021, and the company accounted for 29% of the city's water use, according to reporting cited by DatacenterDynamics[18]. Microsoft's West Des Moines, Iowa, data centers used up to 11.5 million gallons a month for cooling, about 6% of the city's peak-summer usage, Axios reported[19].
How do data centers use water?
Mostly for cooling. In a common design, a condenser water loop carries heat to a cooling tower, where evaporation removes it to the atmosphere[9]. The Environmental Law Institute says evaporative cooling loses about 80% of the water it draws to evaporation and discharges the other 20%[3]. LBNL notes that cooling-tower evaporation is behind local concerns about data center water use[20].
Other designs use much less. Air cooling can need little water when outside air is cold, though it may still use cooling towers[3]. Direct-to-chip liquid cooling pumps water or a glycol mix through channels on the chips in a closed loop to a chiller[3]. Meta says its closed-loop, dry-cooled sites use no water to run their cooling systems[15], and Microsoft says its zero-water-for-cooling design recirculates water filled once during construction[14]. These are company claims.
Data centers also use water indirectly through the power plants that supply them. A peer-reviewed 2021 study found nearly half of U.S. data center servers are fully or partly powered by plants in water-stressed regions[13].
Withdrawal vs. consumption
Two terms get mixed up. The U.S. Geological Survey defines withdrawal as “Water removed from the ground or diverted from a surface-water source for use”[10], and consumptive use as the part that evaporates or is otherwise not available for immediate reuse[10]. Evaporative cooling is consumptive. The industry metric, Water Usage Effectiveness (WUE), is annual water use divided by IT energy, in liters per kilowatt-hour[21], and includes cooling-tower evaporation[21].
Do data centers recycle water?
Some do, in two ways. Closed-loop cooling recirculates the same water instead of evaporating it (see above). Others use reclaimed wastewater: Loudoun Water in Virginia built its reclaimed water system beginning in 2010 to supply industrial cooling water to data centers, and it now spans 20 miles of pipeline[22], delivering more than 750 million gallons of reclaimed water in 2025[22]. Google says its Douglas County, Georgia, data centers began cooling servers with recycled water in 2012[23].
Recycling has limits. The Environmental Law Institute notes that reclaimed water used this way is not returned to the local watershed[3], and evaporative systems still lose most of the water they draw[3].
What the biggest companies report
- Google: 10.9 billion gallons across data centers and offices in 2025, up 34% from 2024[16].
- Microsoft: 8,170 megaliters company-wide in fiscal 2025, up from 3,990 in FY20[17].
- Meta: 2,974 megaliters at its data centers in 2024[24].
All company-reported.
What the Census record shows
Of 46 active AI data center projects in the Census, 7 publish a water-use figure and 22 describe closed-loop, air or dry cooling, or say they use no water for cooling. Those descriptions are the developers’ or officials’ own. See the AI data center count.
Water figures, project by project
Of 186 tracked projects, 45 have a published water-use figure and 111 disclose something about water or cooling. Many figures are permit limits or estimates; open a project for the source and notes.
| Project | Water use | Water source | Cooling |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fermi America Project Matador Amarillo, Carson County, TX | 2,500,000 gal/day ↗ | City of Amarillo (municipal) ↗ | Not published |
| Stratos Project Box Elder County, UT | Not published | Privately owned water rights; pending application for 11 acre-feet per year for power generation after an earlier 1,900 acre-foot application was withdrawn following public objection ↗ | closed-loop ↗ |
| Comanche Circle Tolar, Hood County, TX | 150,000 gal/day ↗ | private groundwater wells; private wastewater treatment plant ↗ | closed-loop (company-stated) ↗ |
| Homer City Energy Campus Homer City, Indiana County, PA | Not published | Two Lick Creek, supplied by the Central Indiana County Water Authority ↗ | Not published |
| Project Camellia Rincon, Effingham County, GA | 30,000 gal/day ↗ | Effingham County Water Treatment Plant, without line extensions ↗ | closed-loop ↗ |
| Project Thunderbird Enid, Garfield County, OK | Not published | Raw water from the Kaw Lake pipeline ↗ | closed-loop ↗ |
| Project Tembo Cheyenne, Laramie County, WY | Not published | deep wells beneath the local aquifer ↗ | closed-loop, air-cooled ↗ |
| Project Jupiter Santa Teresa, Doña Ana County, NM | 20,000 gal/day ↗ | Oracle says no potable water for cooling; a well drilled for the project has pumped about 103 million gallons since April 2026 ↗ | closed-loop ↗ |
| Quantum Frederick Adamstown, Frederick County, MD | 1,300,000 gal ↗ | Not published | Not published |
| Meta Maysville campus Maysville, Mason County, KY | Not published | Not published | closed-loop ↗ |
| Project Tamarack West Columbia, Mason County, WV | Not published | Not published | closed-loop ↗ |
| IREN Sweetwater data center campus Sweetwater, Fisher County, TX | Not published | Not published | air and liquid cooling ↗ |
| Project Horizon Fort Stockton, Pecos County, TX | Not published | Non-potable groundwater within existing permitted allocations ↗ | Poolside's 2025 announcement described air cooling; its CEO later described closed-loop liquid cooling using non-potable groundwater ↗ |
| Project Phoenix Shippingport, Beaver County, PA | Not published | Not published | closed-loop system recycling deionized water; zero water for operational cooling (company-stated) ↗ |
| Joliet Technology Center Joliet, Will County, IL | 150,000 gal/day ↗ | Aquifer (city plans shift to Lake Michigan water in 2030) ↗ | closed-loop ↗ |
| Project Cardinal Data Center Campus Yorkville, Kendall County, IL | 42,500 gal/day ↗ | trucked-in water, no municipal water ↗ | air-cooled closed loop ↗ |
| Project Red Clay Hayneville, Lowndes County, AL | 100,000 gal/day ↗ | Pintlala Water System ↗ | Not published |
| Vantage Frontier Campus Albany, Shackelford County, TX | Not published | Not published | air and liquid cooling; closed-loop chiller design ↗ |
| Saline Township Stargate Data Center Saline Township, Washtenaw County, MI | 20,000 gal/day ↗ | On-site well with its own waste treatment system ↗ | Closed-loop, air-cooled; consent judgment bans water-intensive evaporative cooling ↗ |
| Port Washington (Lighthouse) Data Center Campus Port Washington, Ozaukee County, WI | 10,000 gal/day ↗ | Not published | Air-cooled and liquid-to-liquid systems with closed-loop chilled water (developer says WUE near zero) ↗ |
| Project Arrowhead Irwin County, GA | 50,000 gpd ↗ | Floridan Aquifer, on-site well ↗ | Not published |
| Prometheus Hyperscale Evanston Campus Evanston, Uinta County, WY | Not published | private on-site well ↗ | water-glycol mixture ↗ |
| Fort Meade Hyperscale Data Center Fort Meade, Polk County, FL | 50,000 gal/day ↗ | Upper Floridan Aquifer (city water) ↗ | closed-loop ↗ |
| Meramec Valley Technology Park Pacific, Franklin County, MO | 1,500,000 gal/day ↗ | Reclaimed wastewater (gray water) from the City of Pacific's wastewater treatment plant, per the developer's proposal ↗ | Not published |
| Project Marvel Bessemer, Jefferson County, AL | 2,000,000 gal/day ↗ | Warrior River Water Authority (with Jefferson County Sewer), per developer; discussions ongoing as of Nov. 2025 ↗ | closed-loop ↗ |
| Stargate Abilene Abilene, Taylor County, TX | Not published | Not published | closed-loop liquid ↗ |
| Stargate Milam County Burlington, Milam County, TX | Not published | Company says the site is designed to minimize water use (no figures given) ↗ | Closed-loop water cooling ↗ |
| QTS Cedar Rapids Data Center Campus Cedar Rapids, Linn County, IA | Not published | Not published | closed-loop, water-free cooling ↗ |
| Goodnight Campus Claude, Armstrong County, TX | Not published | Aquifer (groundwater), with recirculating cooling ↗ | closed-loop / recirculating ↗ |
| Global AI Data Center Windsor, Weld County, CO | Not published | Initial fill of 65,000 gallons with about 6,500 gallons annual top-off ↗ | closed-loop (permit condition) ↗ |
| Joule Energy and Data Center Campus McCornick, Millard County, UT | Not published | Not published | Developer cites the site elevation for cooling efficiency ↗ |
| Meta El Paso Data Center El Paso, El Paso County, TX | 2,500,000 gal/day ↗ | Not published | Not published |
| Meta Lebanon Data Center Lebanon, Boone County, IN | 3,000,000 gal/day ↗ | Eagle Creek Reservoir and other sources piped to LEAP district, per News and Tribune ↗ | closed-loop, direct-to-chip liquid cooling with dry coolers ↗ |
| Project Boulder Walterboro, Colleton County, SC | Not published | About 500,000 gallons to fill closed-loop system ↗ | closed-loop non-evaporative ↗ |
| Project Cannoli Van Buren Township, Wayne County, MI | 3,600,000 gal/day ↗ | Great Lakes Water Authority (GLWA) system via a connection to the 42-inch GLWA main at Tyler and Haggerty roads ↗ | Not published |
| Stafford Technology Campus Stafford County, VA | Not published | Reclaimed (purple pipe) water ↗ | Not published |
| Project Sail Newnan, Coweta County, GA | 300,000 gal/day ↗ 6,000,000 gal/day ↗ | Not published | Not published |
| Crossroads Technology Campus Spotsylvania County, VA | 1,000,000 gal/day ↗ | Reuse water; potable water not to be used for cooling ↗ | Not published |
| Lake Mariner Somerset, Niagara County, NY | Not published | Not published | closed-loop water cooling ↗ |
| North Country Colocation Services Massena Expansion Massena, St. Lawrence County, NY | Not published | Not published | Closed-loop, with no withdrawals or discharges to local waterways for non-contact cooling in the revised plan ↗ |
| CyrusOne Sangamon County Data Center Waverly, Sangamon County, IL | 2,800 gal/day ↗ | Apple Creek Water Cooperative ↗ | air-cooled, closed-loop ↗ |
| Amazon Web Services Louisa County campuses Louisa, Louisa County, VA | Not published | Northeast Creek Reservoir (raw water) ↗ | water-cooled using untreated raw water ↗ |
| CRG Festus Data Center Festus, Jefferson County, MO | Not published | Not published | closed-loop (per CRG) ↗ |
| Compass Statesville Statesville, Iredell County, NC | Not published | Not published | air-cooled ↗ closed-loop hybrid cooling (developer-stated) ↗ |
| Logan Prairie Data Center Latham, Logan County, IL | 9,000 gal/day ↗ | Cooling water hauled in from elsewhere, per Hut 8 officials ↗ | Closed-loop cooling (company description) ↗ |
| Tooele Valley data center (Burmester Road / I-80) Tooele County, UT | Not published | Groundwater treated by reverse osmosis; brine discharged toward Great Salt Lake (up to 0.26 MGD at full build-out, ~29,000 gpd Phase I) ↗ | Not published |
| CyrusOne CHI-11 Data Center Campus Yorkville, Kendall County, IL | 40,000 gal/day ↗ | Not published | closed-loop ↗ |
| Polaris Forge 1 Ellendale, Dickey County, ND | Not published | Not published | closed-loop recirculating water; company calls it waterless cooling ↗ |
| Hut 8 River Bend Campus St. Francisville, West Feliciana Parish, LA | Not published | Not published | closed-loop ↗ |
| Imperial Data Center Imperial, Imperial County, CA | 750,000 gal/day ↗ | Originally planned recycled water from nearby cities; developer now seeking Colorado River water from Imperial Irrigation District ↗ | Not published |
| CoreWeave Lancaster data center Lancaster, Lancaster County, PA | 20,000 gal/day ↗ | Not published | air cooling and a closed-loop water system ↗ |
| Google Botetourt County Data Center Campus Botetourt County, VA | 2,000,000 gal/day ↗ | Western Virginia Water Authority (new infrastructure at Google's expense) ↗ | air-cooling for the first of three buildings ↗ |
| Lake Hawkeye Lansing, Tompkins County, NY | Not published | Bolton Point municipal system, with on-site storage, per the developer ↗ | Sealed closed-loop system that recirculates the same fluid, per the developer ↗ |
| Nebius Vineland Data Center Vineland, Cumberland County, NJ | Not published | Nebius says 1 million-gallon initial fill and about 7 Olympic pools a year; press reports about 20 million gallons a year ↗ | closed-loop ↗ |
| New Hill Digital Campus Apex, Wake County, NC | Not published | recirculating nonpotable water (developer-stated) ↗ | Not published |
| Project Blue Tucson, Pima County, AZ | 20,000 gal/day ↗ | Groundwater wells approved by ADWR ↗ | closed-loop air-cooled ↗ |
| Golden Valley Technology Hub Taft, Kern County, CA | Not published | Not published | closed-loop, non-evaporative ↗ |
| Project Mila Trenton, Butler County, OH | Not published | municipal (City of Trenton system) ↗ | direct evaporative free-air cooling ↗ |
| QTS Fayetteville data center campus Fayetteville, Fayette County, GA | 2,000 gal/day ↗ | Fayette County Water System (municipal) ↗ | closed-loop ↗ |
| Sabey Decatur Technology Park Indianapolis, Marion County, IN | Not published | Not published | closed-loop water-reduction system (developer-stated) ↗ |
| Perry Township Data Center Canton, Stark County, OH | Not published | municipal (City of Canton) ↗ | ambient air in cooler months; active cooling mainly in summer ↗ |
| Prime Phoenix Campus Avondale, AZ | Not published | Not published | closed-loop cooling engineered for zero process water use during operations ↗ |
| Meta Beaver Dam Data Center Beaver Dam, Dodge County, WI | Not published | Meta says it will restore 100% of water consumed to local watersheds ↗ | dry cooling ↗ closed-loop liquid ↗ |
| WF Industrial Yaphank Data Center Yaphank, Suffolk County, NY | 700,000 gal/day ↗ | Not published | Closed-loop system; developer says rainwater collection would supply it ↗ |
| Quiet Data Centers, Trestle Road Enfield, Halifax County, NC | 3,000 gal/day ↗ | Not published | Sealed cooling loop (closed circuit reusing the same water) ↗ |
| Utah Data Center Bluffdale, Utah County, UT | 1,700,000 gal/day ↗ 1,200,000 gal/day ↗ | municipal (City of Bluffdale water-delivery system) ↗ | Not published |
| Blueprint Taylor Data Center Taylor, Williamson County, TX | Not published | Not published | closed-loop ↗ |
| Deep Green Lansing data center Lansing, Ingham County, MI | less than 500,000 gallons per year ↗ | Not published | Not published |
| DC BLOX Nashville Data Center Nashville, Davidson County, TN | Not published | Not published | closed-loop water recirculation (per DC BLOX) ↗ |
| Amazon Data Services King George campus (former Birchwood power plant site) King George County, VA | Not published | Agreement contemplated Amazon providing at least 600,000 gallons per day of raw surface water to the county at no charge ↗ | Not published |
| Amazon Web Services Madison County Mega Site campus Canton, Madison County, MS | Not published | Canton Municipal Utilities now; switching to treated municipal wastewater (Veolia facility) for cooling ↗ | Not published |
| Amazon Web Services Richmond County data center campus Hamlet, Richmond County, NC | Not published | Richmond County water system (municipal) ↗ | outside air most of the year, with water-based cooling in peak summer ↗ |
| Augusta Township Data Center (Thor Equities) Augusta Township, Washtenaw County, MI | 1,000,000 gal/day ↗ | Not published | Not published |
| AVAIO Digital Leo Little Rock, Pulaski County, AR | Not published | Not published | water-efficient cooling technologies with cooling-system economization (company description) ↗ |
| AWS Project Green New Florence, Montgomery County, MO | Not published | Deep wells in the Cambrian-Ordovician aquifer (drilled to about 1,500 feet) ↗ | Outside-air cooling most of the year, with water cooling part of the time ↗ |
| AWS Wilmington data center Wilmington, Clinton County, OH | 6 million gallons per year ↗ | Not published | Not published |
| Balico data center campus and gas plant Chatham, Pittsylvania County, VA | 2,000,000 gal/day ↗ | Not published | Not published |
| Compass Datacenters Red Oak second campus Red Oak, Ellis County, TX | Not published | Not city water for cooling (per city leaders) ↗ | closed-loop ↗ |
| Falls Township Innovation Campus Falls Township, Bucks County, PA | Not published | Not published | Water-based cooling less than 2% of the year ↗ |
| Gateway Digital Campus Villa Ridge, Franklin County, MO | Not published | Not published | Closed-loop water system ↗ |
| Google Chesterfield County data center campuses Chesterfield County, VA | 6,000,000 gal/day ↗ 1,755,000 gal/day ↗ 850,000 gal/day ↗ | County water; Google studying treated wastewater reuse from Proctors Creek Wastewater Treatment Plant ↗ | Not published |
| Google Hermantown Data Center Hermantown, St. Louis County, MN | 50,000 gal/day ↗ | Not published | no water used for cooling ↗ air cooling or closed-loop design under consideration ↗ |
| Google Morgan County Data Center Monrovia, Morgan County, IN | Not published | Not onsite groundwater (company-stated) ↗ | Not published |
| Google Palo data center campus Palo, Linn County, IA | 12,000,000 gal/day ↗ | Cedar River ↗ | Not published |
| Highlander SM One data center San Marcos, Hays County, TX | 70,000 gal/day ↗ | Local aquifers ↗ | Not published |
| Kenwood Commons Albany, Albany County, NY | Not published | Not published | air-cooled ↗ |
| Menomonie Data Center (Balloonist LLC) Menomonie, Dunn County, WI | 75,000 gal/day ↗ | Not published | Not published |
| Meta Cheyenne Data Center Cheyenne, Laramie County, WY | Not published | Not published | First phase closed-loop; second phase evaporative ↗ |
| Meta Rosemount Data Center Rosemount, Dakota County, MN | Not published | Not published | closed-loop liquid ↗ dry cooling ↗ |
| Microsoft Fairwater Mount Pleasant, Racine County, WI | Not published | Racine water; the expansion's annual requirement is not to exceed 8.4 million gallons ↗ | closed-loop liquid cooling for over 90% of facility; outside air for the rest, with water only on the hottest days ↗ |
| Microsoft Fairwater Atlanta Fayetteville, Fayette County, GA | Not published | closed-loop; Microsoft says the initial fill equals what about 20 homes use in a year and operations consume almost zero water ↗ | closed-loop liquid (direct liquid cooling at rack level, ~140 kW per rack) ↗ |
| Microsoft Gaines Township data center Caledonia, Kent County, MI | Not published | Byron-Gaines Water System (municipal); Microsoft says it will not withdraw groundwater ↗ | Not published |
| Microsoft Mega Park Person County, NC | Not published | Not published | Air-cooled chillers with a closed, recirculating water loop ↗ |
| Pennsylvania Digital 1 (PAX-1) Middlesex Township, Cumberland County, PA | 400,000 gal/day ↗ | Not published | Not published |
| Project Bluegrass Burgin, Mercer County, KY | Not published | Not published | closed-loop ↗ |
| Project Cherry Blossom Frenchtown Township, Monroe County, MI | Not published | Not published | closed-loop, one-time fill ↗ |
| Project Cornmaze Beloit, Rock County, WI | Not published | Not published | closed-loop water cooling (developer claim) ↗ |
| Project Galaxy (AWS Sidney data center) Sidney, Shelby County, OH | approximately 5 million gallons per year ↗ | municipal (City of Sidney public water system) ↗ | Not published |
| Project Liberty Marion, Marion County, SC | 7,175 gal/day ↗ | Not published | closed-loop ↗ |
| Project Rainier (AWS New Carlisle campus) New Carlisle, St. Joseph County, IN | Not published | Not published | Per AWS, no cooling water used October–March, minimal use April–September ↗ |
| Project Spalding Spalding County, GA | Not published | Not published | Closed-loop water system (county requirement for data centers) ↗ |
| Project Steel Data Center Campus Yorkville, Kendall County, IL | 25,000–42,400 ↗ | Not published | air-cooled ↗ |
| Project Tango Loxahatchee, Palm Beach County, FL | Not published | Estimated 1.7 million gallons of water monthly (21 million gallons annually); would likely require water cooling systems ↗ | Not published |
| QTS Augusta Data Center Campus Augusta, Augusta-Richmond County, GA | 18,000 gal/day ↗ | Augusta Utilities ↗ | closed-loop ↗ |
| QTS York County Data Center Campus Lake Wylie, York County, SC | Not published | Not published | closed-loop (sealed system after initial fill of about 600,000 gallons) ↗ |
| Salem Township Innovation Campus Salem Township, Luzerne County, PA | Not published | Susquehanna River, via Talen Energy's existing infrastructure and withdrawal docket ↗ | Outside-air cooling most of the year; water-based cooling less than 2% of the year ↗ |
| Spring Valley Technology Park Loudoun County, VA | Not published | Not published | Air-cooling technology (applicant commitment) ↗ |
| Switch Big Beaver data center campus Big Beaver, Beaver County, PA | Not published | Beaver Falls Municipal Authority ↗ | closed-loop (Switch EVO design) ↗ |
| Switch Core 2.0 Phase 1 Campus North Las Vegas, Clark County, NV | Not published | Not published | closed-loop (Switch EVO design) ↗ |
| Wallace Jackson Data Center Campus Griffin, Spalding County, GA | Not published | Not published | closed-loop water system (required by county) ↗ |
| White Oak Technology Park Appling, Columbia County, GA | 6,500,000 gal/day ↗ | Not published | Closed-loop cooling required under Data Center zoning district ↗ |
“Not published” means no figure was found in the sources reviewed. Convert any figure into household terms.
Common questions
Why do data centers use so much water?
Mostly to cool their servers. Computing turns electricity into heat, and evaporating water in cooling towers is the most energy-efficient way to remove it at scale, but the water that evaporates is used up: the Environmental Law Institute estimates about 80% of the water drawn is lost this way. Denser AI computing adds more heat per rack.
Why do data centers need water?
To reject heat. Evaporative cooling is generally more energy efficient than waterless systems, so many large data centers use it. They also use water indirectly through the power plants that make their electricity: about 211 billion gallons in 2023, versus about 17 billion gallons used directly.
How much water do data centers use?
U.S. data centers directly used about 17 billion gallons of water in 2023, according to an estimate cited by the Congressional Research Service, and about 211 billion gallons indirectly through electricity generation. The largest individual data centers can use up to 5 million gallons a day.
How do data centers use water?
Mainly for cooling. In evaporative cooling, water carries heat to a cooling tower and evaporates; the Environmental Law Institute says evaporation takes about 80% of the water drawn. Air-cooled and closed-loop liquid designs use much less.
Do data centers recycle water?
Some do. Closed-loop systems recirculate water, and some data centers use reclaimed wastewater, such as the Loudoun Water system in Virginia. Evaporative cooling still loses most of the water it draws.
Do AI data centers use a lot of water?
They can, because AI racks run far hotter than ordinary ones, but many new AI campuses use closed-loop liquid or air cooling that needs little water on site. The larger share is indirect: power plants supplying U.S. data centers consumed about 211 billion gallons in 2023, versus about 17 billion used directly.
Do data centers use more water than homes?
Most use about as much as a large office building or less, according to Virginia’s JLARC, but a few use substantially more, and the largest can use up to 5 million gallons a day.
Sources
- DATA CENTERS AND WATER: What Congress foundWestern Water · 2026-08-07
Source excerpt
“One study cited by the Congressional Research Service estimated that U.S. data centers directly used approximately 17 billion gallons of water in 2023. That compares with about 5.6 billion gallons in 2014.”
- Data Centers and Water ConsumptionEnvironmental and Energy Study Institute (EESI) · 2025-06-25
3 source excerpts
“A federal report estimated that the indirect water consumption footprint (from electricity use) of data centers in the United States was roughly 211 billion gallons in 2023.”
“In areas with limited water availability, server liquid cooling is the best choice, as it requires minimal water consumption. Conversely, in areas with a strained power grid, an evaporative air cooling tower is a suitable building design, as it requires minimal power usage.”
“Larger data centers can each 'drink' up to 5 million gallons per day, or about 1.8 billion annually, usage equivalent to a town of 10,000 to 50,000 people.”
- Data Centers and Water Fact SheetEnvironmental Law Institute · 2026-01
5 source excerpts
“Combines air cooling with open-loop water evaporation to cool air in the data center. Approximately 80% of water drawn is lost to evaporation and 20% is discharged.”
“U.S. data centers directly consumed approximately 21.2 billion liters of water in 2014 and 66 billion liters in 2023.”
“Air conditioning, fans, and vents used to expel hot air and intake cool air. This can have low water requirements if ambient air temperature is cold (e.g. 'free' cooling), or may require cooling towers.”
“Liquid is pumped through microchannels directly on the chips surface to absorb heat. Most commonly use pure water or a glycol mix of liquid and run in a closed-loop system to a chiller.”
“Data centers that use reclaimed water will often treat the water themselves on-site and have a water storage system, reducing their peak demand impact on a water utility. But even when facilities use reclaimed water, that water is not being returned to the local watershed where it is needed.”
- Understanding How Data Centers Impact Surface and Ground WatersUniversity of Georgia College of Agricultural & Environmental Sciences (UGA Extension) · 2026-06-10
Source excerpt
“A majority of large modern data centers use evaporative cooling because it is energy-efficient, especially in hot climates. The downside is that it directly consumes water.”
- Data Centers in Virginia (Report 598)Joint Legislative Audit and Review Commission, Virginia General Assembly · 2024-12-09
2 source excerpts
“The amount of water a data center uses depends on its size, computing density, and type of cooling system.”
“Most data centers use about the same amount of water or less as an average large office building, although a few require substantially more, and some require less than a typical household.”
- High-Performance Computing Data Center Cooling System Energy EfficiencyNational Renewable Energy Laboratory (nrel.gov) · 2025-04-10
Source excerpt
“IT equipment, such as compute clusters and data storage systems, produces heat as a byproduct.”
- DOE Announces $40 Million for More Efficient Cooling for Data CentersU.S. Department of Energy · 2023-05-09
Source excerpt
“data center cooling can account for up to 40% of data center energy usage overall”
- Data Centers and Water: Frequently Asked Questions (R49057)Congressional Research Service (via EveryCRSReport.com) · 2026-07-31
2 source excerpts
“Trade-offs in water consumed and power usage exist between evaporation-based cooling systems and air-cooled systems. Evaporation-based cooling systems are generally more energy efficient than air-cooled chillers or other waterless systems. While air-cooled chillers use no water, they use comparatively more energy.”
“Closed-loop cooling systems, which circulate water within a sealed system without direct exposure to the environment, may generate more limited wastewater discharges during normal operational phases.”
- Cooling Water Efficiency Opportunities for Federal Data CentersU.S. Department of Energy, Federal Energy Management Program · 2019-01-09
Source excerpt
“The condenser water loop carries the heat to the cooling tower where the evaporative process extracts the heat and dissipates it to the surrounding atmosphere.”
- Water Use TerminologyU.S. Geological Survey
2 source excerpts
“The part of water withdrawn that is evaporated, transpired, incorporated into products or crops, consumed by humans or livestock, or otherwise not available for immediate use.”
“Water removed from the ground or diverted from a surface-water source for use.”
- Next-Gen AI Needs Liquid CoolingIEEE Spectrum · 2025-10-13
Source excerpt
“The average power density in a rack was around 8 kW … For AI, that's growing to 100 kW per rack. That's an order of magnitude.”
- Data Centers and Their Energy Consumption: Frequently Asked Questions (R48646)Congressional Research Service · 2025-08-26
Source excerpt
“High-performance computing (HPC) equipment has necessitated cooling methods that are thermodynamically closer to the chips and intercept the energy before it has substantially raised the room air temperature. These direct liquid cooling technologies can address the higher power of HPC.”
- The environmental footprint of data centers in the United StatesLawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (Environmental Research Letters) · 2021-05
2 source excerpts
“Large amounts of water are also required to operate data centers, both directly for liquid cooling and indirectly to produce electricity. ... Our bottom-up approach reveals one-fifth of data center servers direct water footprint comes from moderately to highly water stressed watersheds”
“nearly half of servers are fully or partially powered by power plants located within water stressed regions.”
- Sustainable by design: Next-generation datacenters consume zero water for coolingMicrosoft · 2024-12-09
3 source excerpts
“this design will avoid the need for more than 125 million liters of water per year per datacenter.”
“Replacement of evaporative systems with mechanical cooling will increase our power usage effectiveness (PUE). … The result is a nominal increase in our annual energy usage compared to our evaporative datacenter designs across the global fleet.”
“These new liquid cooling technologies recycle water through a closed loop. Once the system is filled during construction, it will continually circulate water between the servers and chillers to dissipate heat without requiring a fresh water supply.”
- Advancing Water Stewardship in Our Data Center CommunitiesMeta · 2025-12-17
Source excerpt
“For these data centers, there is no operational water use in the cooling system and water use at the site is minimal and limited to domestic and janitorial needs, equipment cleaning, and fire protection.”
- Google 2026 Environmental ReportGoogle · 2026-06
2 source excerpts
“Our water consumption increased 34% from 2024 to 2025 as we continued to meet the world's increasing demand for digital services.”
“In 2025, we consumed 10.9 billion gallons (41 billion liters or 41 million cubic meters) of water across our data centers and offices.”
- 2026 Environmental Sustainability Report Data Fact SheetMicrosoft · 2026
Source excerpt
“Table 8 – Water and effluents (ML) ... Total water consumption 3,990 4,794 5,329 5,818 6,693 8,170”
- We now know how much water Google's Oregon data centers use, after city drops lawsuit against journalistsDatacenterDynamics · 2022-12-19
Source excerpt
“In 2021, the company's facilities consumed 355.1 million gallons of water, The Oregonian/OregonLive reports. ... He said that the city's overall water use has doubled from 2002 to 2021 ... Google accounts for 29 percent of the city's total consumption.”
- Microsoft's AI epicenter is an Iowa water hogAxios Des Moines · 2023-09-18
Source excerpt
“consumed as much as 11.5 million gallons of water a month for cooling, or about 6% of WDM's total usage during peak summer usage during the last two years.”
- 2024 United States Data Center Energy Usage ReportLawrence Berkeley National Laboratory · 2024-12-20
Source excerpt
“The water evaporation process in cooling towers has raised concerns regarding data center water consumption and availability at the local level.”
- Water Usage Effectiveness (WUE): A Green Grid Data Center Sustainability Metric (White Paper #35)The Green Grid · 2011
2 source excerpts
“The metric for water usage in the data center is defined at a high level as: Annual Water Usage / IT Equipment Energy ... The units of WUE are liters/kilowatt-hour (L/kWh).”
“Water consumed for cooling the data center or data center–associated power-generating equipment (including cooling tower evaporation, blowdown, and drift)”
- Reclaimed Water ProgramLoudoun Water · 2026
2 source excerpts
“In 2010 Loudoun Water constructed the first pipelines of the reclaimed water distribution system to supply irrigation and industrial cooling water to Loudoun County's rapidly growing data center industry. The reclaimed water distribution system has since expanded to 20 miles of pipeline.”
“In 2025, Loudoun Water delivered more than 750 million gallons of reclaimed water to customers, helping to save an equal amount of potable drinking water.”
- Douglas County, Georgia - Google Data CentersGoogle · 2026
Source excerpt
“our facilities in the region are among the first in the industry to use recycled industrial water to cool our servers.”
- Meta 2025 Environmental Data IndexMeta · 2025-10
Source excerpt
“Water Consumption (in megaliters) ... Data centers total 2,197 162 2,511 2,938 2,974”
Each source was opened and checked against the excerpt shown. Company statements are identified as such. Figures are as published; where sources differ, each is shown.